The Metaphysical Problem of Other Minds
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract This paper presents a distinctively metaphysical version of the problem other minds. The main source this lies in principle that, when it comes to consciousness, no distinction can sensibly be drawn between appearance and reality. I will argue unless we want call that into question, should seriously consider possibility accepting conclusion minds are not like our own. option is less problematic than might seem at first if willing reconceive facts consciousness as subjective rather objective nature.
منابع مشابه
the problem of divine hiddenness
این رساله به مساله احتجاب الهی و مشکلات برهان مبتنی بر این مساله میپردازد. مساله احتجاب الهی مساله ای به قدمت ادیان است که به طور خاصی در مورد ادیان ابراهیمی اهمیت پیدا میکند. در ادیان ابراهیمی با توجه به تعالی خداوند و در عین حال خالقیت و حضور او و سخن گفتن و ارتباط شهودی او با بعضی از انسانهای ساکن زمین مساله ای پدید میاید با پرسشهایی از قبیل اینکه چرا ارتباط مستقیم ویا حداقل ارتباط وافی به ب...
15 صفحه اولEmotion and Other Minds
What is the relation between emotional experience and its behavioural expression? As very preliminary clarification, I mean by ‘emotional experience’ such things as the subjective feeling of being afraid of something, or of being angry at someone. On the side of behavioural expression, I focus on such things as cowering in fear, or shaking a fist or thumping the table in anger. Very crudely, th...
متن کاملDescartes and Other Minds
Descartes's distinction between material and thinking substance gives rise to a question both about our knowledge of the external world and about our knowledge of another mind. Descartes says surprinsingly little about this second question. In the Second Meditation he writes of our (single) judgement that the figures outside his window are men and not automatic machines. It is argued in this pa...
متن کاملQuantum Gravity as a Metaphysical Problem
Quantum gravity is usually represented as being one of the central open problems of modern fundamental physics. It is presented as being “a dream, a theoretical need and a scientific goal. It is a theory which still does not exist in complete form”, a “yet-to-be-found theory” [1]. The starting point of this paper is that such a non-existence claim is wrong: There exists a simple and straightfor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0279-0750', '1468-0114']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12380